It’s nice to have a president who is not so sleazy that the entire Supreme Court is forced to boycott his State of the Union address (Bill Clinton, January 1999: All nine justices skipped the president’s speech to protest Clinton’s open disregard for the law in the Paula Jones case. Except David Souter, who missed the speech to watch “Sex and the City.”)
Speaking of which, the horny hick’s wife finally ended the breathless anticipation by announcing that she is running for president! I studied tapes of Hillary feigning shock at hearing about Monica to help look surprised when I learned Hillary’s running.
As long as we have revived the practice of celebrating multicultural milestones (briefly suspended when Condoleezza Rice became the first black female secretary of state), let us pause to note that Mrs. Clinton, if elected, would be the first woman to become president after her husband had sex with an intern in the Oval Office.
According to the famed “polls” — or, as I call them, “surveys of uninformed people who think it’s possible to get the answer wrong” — Hillary is the current front-runner for the Democrats. Other than the massive case of narcolepsy her name inspires, this would cause me not the slightest distress — except for the fact that the Republicans’ current front-runners are John McCain and Rudy Giuliani.
Fortunately, polls at this stage are nothing but name recognition contests, so please stop asking me to comment on them. “Arsenic” and “proctologist” have sky-high name recognition going for them, too.
In January,1998 — two years before the 2000 presidential election — the leading Republican candidate in New Hampshire was … Liddy Dole! (WMUR-TV/CNN poll, Jan. 12, 1999). In the end, Liddy Dole’s most successful run turned out to be a mad dash from her husband Bob after he accidentally popped two Viagras.
At this stage before the 1992 presidential election, the three leading Democratic candidates were, in order: Mario Cuomo, Jesse Jackson and Lloyd Bentsen (Public Opinion Online, Feb. 21, 1991).
Only three months before the 1988 election, William Schneider cheerfully reported in The National Journal that Michael Dukakis beat George Herbert Walker Bush in 22 of 25 polls taken since April of that year. Bush did considerably better in the poll taken on Election Day.
(The average poll respondent reads the above information and announces that the administrations of presidents Cuomo, Dole and Dukakis are going in “the wrong direction.”)
Still and all, Mrs. Clinton is probably the real front-runner based on: (1) the multiple millions of dollars she has raised, and (2) the fact that her leading Democratic opponent is named “Barack Hussein Obama.” Or, as he’s known at CNN, “Osama.” Or, as he’s known on the Clinton campaign, “The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations.”
Mrs. Clinton’s acolytes are floating the idea of Hillary as another Margaret Thatcher to get past the question, “Can a woman be elected president?” This is based on the many, many things Hillary Clinton and Margaret Thatcher have in common, such as the lack of a Y chromosome and … hmmm, you know, I think that’s it.
Girl-power feminists who got where they are by marrying men with money or power — Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Arianna Huffington and John Kerry — love to complain about how hard it is for a woman to be taken seriously.
It has nothing to do with their being women. It has to do with their cheap paths to power. Kevin Federline isn’t taken seriously either.
It is as easy to imagine Americans voting for someone like Margaret Thatcher or Condoleezza Rice for president as it is difficult to imagine them voting for someone like Hillary. (Or Kevin Federline.) Hillary isn’t piggybacking on Thatcher because she’s a woman, she’s piggybacking on Thatcher because Thatcher made it on her own, which Hillary did not.
But the most urgent question surrounding Hillary’s candidacy is: How will the Democrats out-macho us if Hillary is their presidential nominee? Unlike their last presidential nominee, she doesn’t even have any fake Purple Hearts.
Sen. Jim Webb, who managed to give the rebuttal to President Bush’s State of the Union address Tuesday night without challenging the president to a fistfight (well done, Jim!), won his election last November by portraying himself as one of the new gun-totin’ Democrats.
He once opposed women in the military by calling the idea “a horny woman’s dream.” But — as some of us warned you — it appears that Webb has already been fitted for his tutu by Rahm Emanuel.
Webb began his rebuttal by complaining that we don’t have national health care and aren’t spending enough on “education” (i.e., teachers unions). In other words, he talked about national issues that only are “national issues” because of this country’s rash experiment with women’s suffrage. I guess we should all be relieved that at least Webb’s response did not involve putting a young boy’s penis into a man’s mouth, as characters in his novels are wont to do.
He then palavered on about the vast military experience of his entire family in order to better denounce the war in Iraq. As long as Democrats keep insisting that only warriors can discuss war, how about telling the chick to butt out?
COPYRIGHT 2007 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
4520 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111